A Book Review for The Royal Society of Tasmania by John Williamson

Patrick G. Quilty, 2021 The Dawning of Antarctica: Through Exploration to Occupation, Hobart: Dr Eva Meidl, pp. 474

This splendid, comprehensive, compendium of every aspect of Antarctic history is a very welcome addition for all scholars of the southern continent. Professor Patrick Quilty AM was Chief Scientist for the Australian Antarctic Division for 18 years and devoted much of his later years to writing this vast and authoritative book on the human history of the Antarctic continent.

Quilty states that his aim for the book is to “summarise … the human history of the exploration of the Antarctic prior to the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957—1958”, and indeed he is able to accomplish this in minute, complex detail. He explains for us the early perceptions of what and where Antarctica was. He examines the role of James Cook through a thorough and authoritative assessment of his second voyage and the circumnavigation of Antarctica. The author is at pains to explain the various claims and counter claims of early Antarctic explorers and his in-depth analysis of logs and journals is impressive as he places those claims as accurately as is possible onto modern maps. For example, the way Quilty analyses von Bellingshausen’s interpretations of the coast, and compares them with a modern map of the South Sandwich Islands, clarifies, for modern readers and researchers, how early explorers charted the coastline they saw – or thought they saw – and to which parts of Antarctica these actually refer. This requires very good understanding of the original logs and journals of 19^th century explorers. Sir Guy Green, in his fine Foreword to this book, notes how thoroughly and successfully Professor Quilty locates, interprets and utilises these primary sources.

Quilty deals in a balanced way with a wide range of issues: the quality and immensity of Thaddeus von Bellingshausen’s voyage in the Southern Ocean; the “Hollow Earth” theories of the early 19^th century and the realities of islands and land that were thought (incorrectly) to exist. His writing on the three major national expeditions during the middle of the 19^th century (US, French and British), is clear about the challenges they faced and the success they nevertheless achieved. Quilty’s maps of the journeys of these three significant expeditions, are immensely satisfying as they are clear, accurate and they point out locational problem areas and suggest solutions to geographical issues that have arisen. This is analytical history at its best and it is a reflection of Quilty’s vast store of knowledge gleaned over many decades of research.

The organisation of this book signposts themes with appropriate headings, with images and maps set in the text to which they refer. His decision to divide the so-called “heroic era” into sub-sections is well advised. This allows Quilty to provide correct weighting not only to the much-referenced expeditions of Scott, Shackleton, Amundsen and Mawson, but also to those whose journeys are often ignored: Charcot, Bruce, Nordenskjöld and Wilkins. The early 20^th century years of exploration are the key moments of this volume. Told with verve and rigour, these voyages become even more fascinating as Quilty examines the complexity of the individuals involved as well as providing an assessment of their scientific and geographical achievements. While managing to avoid controversy over issues such as Scott’s management in a crisis or Amundsen’s actions in going south instead of to the north, Quilty nonetheless makes his views clear and is not afraid of examining the behaviour and leadership of these explorers. His summation of the differing styles of leadership (pp. 234–235) is masterly. There are, throughout the book, excellent biographies of principal characters such as Scott, Shackleton, Wilkins, Byrd et al. and these are generous and fair but show that the author is not blind to the flaws in each personality. These chapters are supported by accurate maps, diagrams and reproductions of paintings which add to the intellectual complexity of this substantial monograph.

The concluding chapters, which discuss the years of World War II and the decades leading up to, and including, the 1957–1958 International Geophysical Year (IGY), are particularly thoughtful, because this is the era with which Quilty had the closest association. He refines our focus on the major scientific drivers of change of that period examining the great importance of the IGY and this provides a strong basis for his general discussion of internationally co-ordinated research in Antarctica. Of course, Professor Quilty’s own research endeavours on the southern continent provide substance to his analysis. It would be hasty to say that it is a pity the book does not develop the story past 1958; but that is merely disappointment on our part that we do not have Professor Quilty’s version of recent events.

Twelve years in the making, this book has been a labour of love, necessity and great scholarship by Professor Quilty. His passion for Antarctic history is obvious.  It is also appropriate that we offer our sincere thanks to those who so carefully edited, after the author’s death, his vast array of text and maps – Margaret Davies, June Pongratz and Eva Meidl. Professor Quilty has left us a fitting legacy and, as Hobart continues to develop its reputation as a major global hub for Antarctic Science, this volume will take its place as one of the most important set of readings on human activity on the ice. Professor Quilty was a world class scientist, and the publication of this book will confirm, in addition, his reputation as an historian of significance.

John Williamson
Hobart, 2022

A Book Review for The Royal Society of Tasmania by John Williamson

Adrian Tinniswood, The Royal Society and the Invention of Modern Science, New York: Basic Books, 2019, pp. 129

This small gem of a book (129 pp.) provides an approachable examination of how the Royal Society came to exist during the 17^th century and what factors allowed it to continue. Tinniswood makes it clear that two factors – the storm of fascination at this time in science and experimentation in Europe and the UK, as well as the patronage of King Charles II – were both vital in the foundation of the Society. The author is both an academic historian and a writer of general and popular history works who has a gift for making clear what, in the hands of others, could become confusing.

The early chapters show how the 1600s were a period during which medieval ideas of science and reality were being overthrown. Developments in Mathematics, Astronomy, Biology and Physics changed the way in which society viewed nature and how new experimental methods challenged earlier concepts and ideas. The Society, Tinniswood explains, grew out of two separate movements – the first was the ‘Great Club’ at Wadham College, Oxford which developed into a haven for ‘experimental philosophy’. A club was set up there that would attract some of the great minds of the age: members from Oxford University included Robert Hooke (microscopist, architect), Christopher Wren (architect, astronomer), Seth Ward (astronomer), Robert Wood (mathematician), and John Wallis.

The second movement that initiated the Society, as outlined by Tinniswood, was a series of informal weekly meetings of academics from both Cambridge and Oxford in the unsettled years before and during the English Civil War. With the revival of monarchy in 1660, these meetings began to take on a more formal structure: held at Gresham College, London, their discussions centred on the newest ideas in science and reviewed the most recent experiments. This revolution in science – ‘advancement through experimentation and ocular inspection’ – was all the more remarkable as most people in Europe at that time, believed in witchcraft and magic. According to Tinniswood, the Royal Society actually created the Scientific Revolution. Although this may be too large a claim, it is true that these scientists were absolutely vital in that 17^th century revolution of ideas.

The author explains that the new King, Charles II, a supporter, provided them with a Royal Charter in 1662. John Evelyn, another early member, provided the now, ‘Royal’, Society’s motto Nullius in verba — ‘Take no-one’s word for it’. This was an indication that the Society’s Fellows were determined to withstand the domination of (ecclesiastical) authority and to ‘verify all statements by an appeal to facts determined by experiment’.

What did the Royal Society do? Tinniswood is at pains to answer this. Initially suggestions of possible experiments were made by members, many of which were actually carried out and then they were written up formally and accurately so that they became a permanent record. By 1665 this record had developed into the Philosophical Transactions, the world’s first and longest continuously published scientific journal. Of this in 1870, the English biologist, T.H. Huxley said, “if all the books in the world, except the [Royal Society’s] Philosophical Transactions were destroyed, it is safe to say that the foundations of the physical science would remain unshaken”.

Later chapters describe the changing location of the Royal Society, the problems that the Society encountered in attempting to choose high quality members and Fellows, and the difficulties the Royal Society faced in dealing with critics at Universities and in the Church. But, Tinniswood assures us, “by the end of the 19^th century the Society, after overcoming much opposition and indifference, had realised the aims of its founders, and at last had become an institution for promoting natural science”.

The author objectively outlines the problems faced by the Society over the centuries and how their handling of these issues was not always perfect. There are several references made to the role of foreign members and Fellows, as well as to the women who have been involved in the Society. Although these sections do seem a bit cursory – in a book of this diminutive size this is understandable – they constitute a very affirmative step.

Tinniswood’s explanations of even very complex issues are lucid and enlightening. The end notes for each chapter are accurate and thorough, the index is clear and the bibliography provides an excellent guide to the Scientific Revolution of the 17^th century. This small monograph charts the evolution of one of the world’s great institutions for the advancement of knowledge and the development and use of science for the benefit of humanity.

Selected References

Tinniswood, A (2019) The Royal Society and the Invention of Modern Science, New York: Basic Books, pp.129

National Museum of Australia, ‘The Royal Society of London’, https://www.nma.gov.au/exhibitions/exploration-and-endeavour/royal-society-london

Wilton, P (2 February, 2010), ‘Oxford and the Royal Society’s Origins’, https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/science-blog/oxford-and-royal-society%E2%80%99s-origins

John Williamson
February, 2022

Wednesday 23 February 10.30am
Central Gallery, TMAG

We are very pleased to invite you to the launch of the Checklist of Tasmanian Beetles by Dr Simon Grove, Senior Curator, Invertebrate Zoology at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery.

This is a joint event hosted by the Friends of TMAG and the Royal Society of Tasmania.

The book, published by the Royal Society of Tasmania with financial support from the Friends, is a catalogue of all the described species of beetles from Tasmania, including Macquarie Island. It includes a meticulous up-to-date list of 2,864 species, including over 600 endemics, and colour plates featuring at least one representative species from almost every one of the 117 beetle families.

Simon Grove will speak to us about Tasmania’s rich array of beetles, and describe how advances in fieldwork and taxonomic studies have contributed to this comprehensive work, which continues a long tradition of developing insect checklists with relevance to Tasmania going back to 1842.

This is a FREE EVENT. Be assured that TMAG is working hard to provide a clean, safe environment for your visit, and seating will be socially distanced. The normal check in requirements will apply when you arrive at TMAG, and you will need to wear a mask (unless the rules change between now and then). 

BOOKINGS ARE REQUIRED – please use this link. Any members unable to use the internet registration, please contact the RST at admin@rst.org.au .

These beautifully bound notebooks feature a choice of three cover images from the Society’s rare art and book collection.

Click here to go to the online shop for immediate purchase.

Two members of the Royal Society of Tasmania have been recognised in the 2022 Australia Day Honours list for their significant achievements and service to the community.

Dr Deborah Beswick has been awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) for her service to education. Deborah’s career as a highly respected science teacher spans more than four decades, and she has made it her mission to inspire thousands of students in the field of science. Most recently Deborah has been the organiser of the Tasmanian Science Talent Search, a large statewide competition for school students. Deborah is a long-standing member of the Society and chairs the RST Bursaries Committee. 

Professor John Church has been made an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO) for distinguished service to climate science through oceanographic and sea-level research and publications. John is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science as well as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering, and has over 180 papers and books to his credit. John was an author on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 

The Royal Society of Tasmania extends very warm congratulations to Deborah and John on their awards.

The President and Council of The Royal Society of Tasmania warmly invite members and friends to a lecture by Professor Greg Lehman followed by dinner on Thursday 9 December 2021, at the Royal Yacht Club of Tasmania.

“Terra nullius in Tasmanian colonial art”

The idea of Australia as an ‘empty land’ was dismissed by The Australian High Court in 1992. However, the implication of terra nullius as a rationale for British occupation of Aboriginal territory persists, largely unrecognised, in our colonial archive. Art Historian Greg Lehman will illustrate a dramatic example of this in the visual history of Van Diemen’s Land.

The address presented by Professor Greg Lehman (Pro Vice-Chancellor Aboriginal Leadership, UTas) will be followed by a two-course plated meal ($65 per person). Wine and beer will be available for purchase. If you have special dietary requirements, please contact the office at admin@rst.org.au

Those wishing to attend must register using the registration form. Download the fillable PDF form here and follow the instructions. Attendance without dinner is permitted at no cost but registration is still required.

Nominations are now open for the RST annual Doctoral awards. Two awards are made for excellence in research by recent PhD graduates. In 2021, one award will be reserved for nominations in non-Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM) disciplines. The other award will be open.

The value of each award is $1,000 (AUD). Nominations will close on 15^th November, 2021. Click here for the guidelines to the awards.

The first joint Royal Society of Tasmania-Beer Aquatic event held on Thursday 26 August was a resounding success. To a packed house at the Hobart Brewing Company, Professor Pete Strutton gave a great talk, ‘Dusty with a chance of phytoplankton’, on the link between land and ocean ecosystems.

RST Council and Events Committee member Shasta Henry spoke briefly about the work of the RST and presented the speaker with a copy of the RST publication “Charles Darwin in Hobart Town”.

Membership Secretary Roxanne Steenbergen had membership forms and information about the Society at the ready.

Many thanks to the speaker, organisers Dr Will Hobbs and Dr Christina Schellenberg, and the RST Councillors and other members who supported the event by attending. We hope that this will become an annual event on the RST calendar to celebrate National Science Week.

---

Address to the Royal Commonwealth Society, Hobart on 19 May 2021

---

The first question I’m going to answer today, is: ‘What makes the Royal Society of Tasmania ‘Royal’ ’?

On 14 October 1843 the Lieutenant Governor of Van Diemen’s Land, Sir John Eardley-Wilmot, convened a meeting of 17 gentlemen at Government House (when Government House was in Macquarie St). They resolved to form a Society called ‘The Botanical and Horticultural Society of Van Diemen’s Land’. I have a facsimile of the Minutes of the first meeting here, which you might be interested to look at later.

The objects of the Society were ‘to develop the physical characteristics of the Island and illustrate its natural history and productions.’ Some of the names of the gentlemen present will be very familiar to you, such as Allport, Cotton and Milligan.

The Governor of the day was to act as President, and succeeding governors served as President until 2002 when the decision was made that the presiding Governor would be Patron of the Society, rather than President.

Governor Eardley-Wilmot reported to the Society in 1844 that Queen Victoria had graciously agreed to become Patron, and she directed the name of the Society to be changed to ‘The Royal Society of Van Diemen’s Land for Horticulture, Botany and the Advancement of Science’. This name was a bit of a mouthful and in 1911 an Act of Parliament was passed to shorten the name to ‘The Royal Society of Tasmania’.

A branch of the Society was formed in Launceston in 1853. It lapsed but was reconstituted in 1921 and has continued since then, celebrating its centenary this year.

The second question I’m going to address today, is: ‘How has the Royal Society of Tasmania contributed to Tasmanian life?’

The Royal Society of Tasmania is the oldest scientific society in Australia and New Zealand, and the third oldest Royal Society in the Commonwealth.

As you all know, in the early days of the colony of Van Diemen’s Land the settlers were confronted with an alien landscape with unfamiliar vegetation, exotic animals and many unknowns. The mission of the Royal Society of Tasmania was to investigate and document the physical characteristics of the island and they did this very assiduously. Some members were gentleman farmers, while others represented a range of professions including lawyers, doctors, surveyors, government employees and leaders of the Church. It is astonishing what these people managed to achieve while holding down day jobs. They went on collecting forays for specimens, observed, recorded, wrote and discussed, sharing their findings with specialists around the world and publishing their findings in the annual journal Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania. The Papers and Proceedings continue to flourish as an annual publication, and its relevance today is indicated by the number of downloads of digitised papers from the journal. Last year there were over 67,000 downloads, showing that the articles are of immense value and interest to people studying aspects of Tasmania. If you’re interested in looking at our digitised articles, go to our website, rst.org.au, and click on the Papers and Proceedings tab. The papers are first published as a hard copy volume, and are then digitised after one year.

In fact the volume of natural history specimens and artwork amassed by the Society became so great that the Society built a museum in Hobart to house the collections. This operated for decades as the Royal Society Museum. Eventually this became too much for a Society of volunteers to run, and in 1885 most of the collections were gifted to the people of Tasmania, forming the basis of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. The Society reserved ownership mostly of artworks and works on paper. The very substantial colonial art collection of over 800 artworks was placed on long-term loan with the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery in 1965.

In its early years, the Society established the Colonial Gardens that later became the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens. The early Minutes document donations of plants received and such minutiae as orders for bricks and nails needed for various projects. This also became too much for a Society of volunteers to run, and the Gardens passed into government ownership. The Society built up a substantial Library which is now housed in the Morris Miller Library in the University of Tasmania. The library contains thousands of valuable and historic items of books, maps and other items related in particular to the history of Tasmania, and is open for access by community members. We’ve begun a process of digitising these items to preserve these important records and make them more accessible.

Fascinating snippets of information are constantly coming to light from the library: for example, during World War Two when it was feared that Tasmania may be attacked and bombed, the Royal Society parcelled up its most significant treasures and lodged these for safe-keeping with trusted members at substantial homes away from the city centre. And at the end of the war, all of these items were carefully checked back in.

About the Society:

The place of women

You may have noticed that I said the Society was formed by a group of gentlemen, and photos of the early Royal Society of Tasmania certainly depict rows of white-bearded and black-mustachioed men. So what was the role of women?

Interestingly, unlike many learned Societies of the time, the Royal Society of Tasmania never banned women from being members or taking part in the business of the meetings. In fact, in 1843 Rule 8 of the newly-constituted Society specified that: ‘Ladies were to be admitted as Fellows ‘upon the same terms, with the same privileges and under the same regulations in all respects as gentlemen.’ This was extremely forward-thinking for its time.

Our Minutes record that a Miss Louisa Bell was nominated for membership in December 1843 and elected a Fellow in January 1844. One historian erroneously concluded that when noted illustrator and naturalist Louisa Anne Meredith was elected an Honorary Fellow of the Society in 1881, it was because a woman couldn’t hold full membership of the Society. But a little digging in the records suggests that her honorary membership was due to her straitened financial circumstances at the time. Other women are mentioned periodically in meeting records, but it wasn’t until 1985 that a woman became Senior Vice-President, and in 2013 the Society elected a female President.

I’m actually only the seventh female office bearer in the 178-year history of the Society, so that’s not a great record. We’re making up for it at the moment with a female Vice-President and female Honorary Secretary. There’s a similar pattern with the awards to noted researchers that appear on the Honour Board in our RST Lecture Room; for many decades the names were all of male researchers, but in recent times outstanding female researchers have been recognised and the ratio of genders on the board is becoming more equal. Incidentally, our Honour Board was carved by noted Tasmanian artist Ellen ‘Nellie’ Payne and is worth viewing when you get the chance.

Now we come to the Northern Branch of the Society.

The Northern Branch of the Society has made an enormous contribution to the social and intellectual fabric of Northern Tasmania. The Branch made key contributions to bodies such as the Cradle Mountain Reserve Board, the Launceston Field Naturalists’ Club, the Launceston 50,000 League and the Scenery Preservation Board. The branch formed in 1853 withered away and was re-established in 1921. Present at that meeting were thirty people including the mayor, lawyers, doctors, teachers and clergymen. A Miss M. Fox M.A. is recorded as attending, and I feel she would have been a person worth meeting.

Prominent solicitor William Henty and naturalist Ronald Campbell Gunn played a key role in the formation of the Northern Branch, with Gunn contributing a vast amount of knowledge to the body of work on Tasmanian flora. The Branch is based at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery in Launceston, and continues to deliver a vibrant lecture program. The Northern Branch celebrates its centenary this year.

So, what does the Society do today?

Our objective since 1911 has been ‘The advancement of knowledge’, and this is what all our activities are directed towards.

We hold a monthly lecture series that is open to the community, and thanks to the COVID pandemic we had to catapult ourselves into the digital age and deliver our lectures by webinar last year. The uptake of this was very good and had the unexpected outcome of expanding our audience to people living interstate and overseas. We also instigated our own YouTube channel last year, and lectures from the North and South of the state are placed on this for public access as part of our community outreach. This has been a great success and we’ve had over 3,500 views of lectures online.

An important part of our platform is recognising and rewarding high-quality research about Tasmania, and we offer a number of awards ranging from students who have just completed their PhDs through to medals for early career, established and distinguished researchers. We also support school students through financial support for the Tasmanian Science Talent Search run by the Science Teachers’ Association, and the Science Investigation Awards run though the University of Tasmania. We also support Tasmanian students selected to represent Australia in international academic competitions; this bursary program is on hold at the moment, as due to the pandemic restrictions, such events are not being held. But we’ll resume our support for this as soon as events start up again.

In addition to publishing our annual journal, the Papers and Proceedings, the Society publishes other items from time to time, including the books you see here on the table today that aim to develop knowledge about aspects of Tasmania. And later this year we’re publishing a complete taxonomy of Tasmanian beetles, which will be an important contribution to this branch of science.

The centrepiece of the Society’s 175^th anniversary celebrations was the brainchild of Royal Society Past President Professor Ross Large: the Dinosaur rEvolution exhibition held in conjunction with the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, and the companion symposium, brought the latest information on dinosaur research to the Tasmanian community. It was very successful in terms of both community interest and revenue for the Society.

You may be aware that in February of this year, the Society delivered a formal Apology to Tasmanian Aboriginal people for past mistreatment and disrespect of Aboriginal remains, culture and artefacts by the Society. Much of this maltreatment occurred in the nineteenth century when the Society ran its museum, collecting and trading Aboriginal remains as commodities rather than as human remains. Our Apology was accepted by several Tasmanian Aboriginal Elders on the day of its delivery. You can watch the Apology ceremony on our YouTube channel and view the full wording on our website. As part of our commitment to ongoing change, the Society is planning a symposium on Aboriginal culture and history for November this year.

The invitation to speak today has made me ponder future connections between the Royal Commonwealth Society and the Royal Society of Tasmania. Nearly all our events are open to community members, so please check out our website rst.org.au to see which events might interest you. And membership is open to everybody with an interest in the advancement of knowledge; I have some forms here today if anyone is interested in joining us, or knows someone who may be interested.

Mary Koolhof
President, The Royal Society of Tasmania

Launch of the Northern Branch Centenary Edition of the RST Papers and Proceedings
27 June 2021

---

Your Excellency, Professor Chalmers, distinguished guests, members and friends of the Royal Society of Tasmania:

The Royal Society of Tasmania has an unbroken record of annual publishing since its inception in 1843. We still produce a hard copy journal, and exchange copies with major academic institutions around the world. But it is in the digital world that the wider significance of the journal becomes apparent.

After twelve months, all the articles in our Papers and Proceedings are digitised and can be downloaded. If you haven’t yet investigated this, there is a link from our website, for you to view and download the digitised articles. And the number of downloads is staggering – for example, last year there were more than 67,000 downloads of our Papers and Proceedings. This is tangible proof of the value of our journal to researchers and to the community.

I’d like to draw your attention to the cover of this volume. A photo of someone standing on a mountaintop looking at one of our beautiful Tasmanian vistas is not unusual today. But this was not the case in 1936, when this photo was taken. Most Tasmanians had never seen photos of our remote and iconic places; the person pictured here is Fred Smithies, a legendary bushwalker and photographer who was President of the Northern Branch for eight years. He and other early Royal Society members campaigned for the establishment of Tasmania’s national parks and reserves.

In this special issue, Dr Eric Ratcliff, Northern Branch President and a member of the Society for over 50 years, offers his reflections on the history of the Branch accompanied by a list of Branch Presidents since 1921. A paper by Lynette Ross provides fascinating insights into the early days of the Northern Branch and the key figures in its formation.

Dr Patsy Cameron, noted researcher and Aboriginal Elder, has contributed a paper ‘Tyereelore and Straitsmen: The true story of Tasmanian Aboriginal survival’ that reveals a nuanced interpretation of Tasmanian Aboriginal histories. Many of you will be aware that greater engagement with the Aboriginal community is a commitment the Society has made following our Apology to Tasmanian Aboriginal people in February this year.

As a child growing up in Northern Tasmania I was thrilled by visits to the planetarium at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery. So I’m delighted that this special volume contains an account by Launceston-based astronomer Dr Martin George of how our small island state became a centre for astronomical research and education recognised worldwide.

Some Tasmanian readers of this volume will remember being given ‘goitre tablets’ as we called them in primary school, containing iodine to combat the deficiency identified in Tasmania, and will read with special interest the article by Dr Paul Richards on the Tasmanian thyrotoxicosis epidemic of the 1960s.

The study of natural history has always been an important focus of the Royal Society of Tasmania. This volume contains an account by Martha McQueen of the contributions made by the Central North Field Naturalists to improving nature conservation in Tasmania.

The Northern Branch of the Royal Society has supported the acquisition by the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery of the nationally significant Lambkin-Knight butterfly collection, and David Maynard explains the importance of this collection to future research.

Naturalists will also be interested to learn more about the endemic Tasmanian Digger Wasp in the article by David Maynard and Simon Fearn. And Rachelle Hawkins explains how the aquarium industry is making an important contribution to improving the survival of two of the world’s most unique marine fish species.

Studying the geological characteristics of Tasmania has been a key focus of the Society; in this volume, Dr Eric Ratcliff continues this tradition by explaining the European uses of dolerite in Tasmania from early colonial times to the present day. Dr Keith Corbett describes the geological history of the Tamar Valley and the Launceston area during the making of Tasmania over 70 million years ago.

Finally, Peter King outlines research led by the Australian Maritime College in Launceston to deploy autonomous underwater vehicles delving beneath Antarctic ice shelves to gather vital information about how glaciers change and melt.

This special volume of the Papers and Proceedings exemplifies the contribution made by the Northern Branch of our Society to knowledge of natural, historical and cultural aspects of Tasmania.

On behalf of the Society, I extend very warm congratulations to everyone involved in the creation of this important special volume, including all the authors; Chel Bardell and the Centenary Committee; Hon. Editor Dr Sally Bryant; and members of the Publications Committee.

It is a great pleasure to launch this centenary edition of the Papers and Proceedings, and to present to the Northern Branch this specially bound and inscribed copy to place in the Northern Branch library. I ask Northern Branch President Dr Eric Ratcliff to come forward to accept this on behalf of the Branch. I also ask the authors to come forward to receive their copies of the journal, and thank them for their contributions.

Mary Koolhof
President
The Royal Society of Tasmania

---

---